The United State in WW II
Woodrow Wilson promised the American people that WW I would
"make
the world safe for democracy." It didn't. Instead,
World
War I led directly to the creation of some of the most tyrannical
regimes the world have ever seen. One of the disturbing
things
about the 20th century is that it was not a century that saw the
universal spread of freedom and democracy. Instead, over and
over
again, democratic governments and proto-democratic governments
gave way
to what we call totalitarianism.
Now there are lots of "flavors" of totalitarianism: Communism,
Fascism,
and National Socialism among others. There are differences
among
these different types of totalitarianism, but they all have in
common
certain things. Most important, a totalitarian system allows
no
check on the authority of government.
There had, of course, been autocratic governments in earlier
history,
e.g.,
absolute monarchy in France under Louis XIV and Prussia under
Frederick
William. But in a totalitarian system, the government goes
much
farther than a ruler like Louis XIV would ever have imagined.
Partly,
the totalitarian governments go farther because they can: only in
the
20th century did technological advances make possible the degree
of
control of all aspects of life that totalitarian governments
implemented. Also, it's not until the 20th century that
governments
start putting into practice the *total* transformation of society
dreamed of by men like Hegel, Nietzsche, and Marx in the 19th
century.
So what leads to totalitarianism? Over and over and
over
again in the 20th century, people had the idea that all of our
problems
could be solved by the government. Got economic problems?
Let the
government fix them. Got social problems? Let the
government fix them. Not happy? Let the government make you
happy.
Now if you want the government to solve all your problems, how
strong
should government be? The stronger the better, right?
Well,
that's what totalitarianism is about: strengthen the power of
government, and let the government create a heaven on earth.
But there is a problem here. Lord Acton said that power
tends to
corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. And he was
right:
the more powerful government gets, the more corrupt it becomes,
and
when there is no check at all on government authority, government
invariably does horrible things.
Henry David Thorough cites an unnamed source as saying, "That
government is best which governs
least." Some, probably wrongly, attribute the line to Thomas
Jefferson, and it is certainly Jeffersonian in spirit. Our
own
country was founded on the principle of *limited*
government. One of the problems with progressivism is it's
tendency to undermine the idea that the growth of government power
is a
bad thing. During the years between the World Wars, however,
American resisted moving in the direction much of the rest of the
world
was taking--totalitarianism was not (yet) an option here.
But
while we were ready for totalitarianism here, we were considerably
less
ready to try to stop the growth of totalitarianism abroad.
During the period after World War I, Americans tended to regard
that
war as a great mistake, and they were determined not to make such
a
mistake again. America’s refusal to get involved in foreign
conflicts made it seem like the country would forever be a
pacifist,
isolationist, and even cowardly nation. World War II showed
that
this was not quite the case.
In the days after World War I, totalitarianism was spreading
everywhere. In 1917, Lenin and the Bolsheviks took over in
the
Soviet union.
In 1922, Mussolini and the Fascists took over in Italy. Also
in
the 1920's, a military dictatorship took over in Japan. In
1932,
Hitler and his Nazis took over in Germany. Now what was
particularly
alarming about all this is that these totalitarian powers were not
content to simply dominate their own people. Each was
committed
to a philosophy of expansion. The Communists wanted world wide
proletarian dictatorship (starting Comintern to that end).
The
Fascist idea was that nations either advance or die. Mussolini
attacked
Ethiopia and wanted more. Hitler and the Japanese too were
committed to a philosophy that said that nations either expand or
die,
and they were determined to expand.
The democracies were very slow to react. When Mussolini
attacked
Ethiopia, the Ethiopian leader Haile Selassie warned that, if the
democracies failed to help Ethiopia, eventually they would face
similar
assaults themselves. The democracies including the
United
States did nothing.
In the 1930's, the Japanese invaded Manchuria, and from that base
attacked every major city of China inflicting horrible atrocities
on
the Chinese people. The democracies including the United
States
did nothing.
Also in the 1930's, Hitler began violating the Versailles
treaty.
He fortified the Rhineland, built up the German military will
beyond
it's 100,000 man Versailles treaty limit. In 1938, his thugs
destabilized Austria and brought about the anschluss, the
unification
of Germany and Austria. The democracies did nothing...and
Hitler
wanted more.
Hitler mobilized his troops along the Czech border, planning to
seize
the Sudetenland. The British warned him not to proceed, but,
after negotiations at Munich, the British Prime Minister, Neville
Chamberlain, agreed to allow Hitler to move into the Sudetenland
in
return for Hitler's promise he would make no more territorial
demands. Chamberlain called this "peace in our time," and
"peace
with honor." Well, if Britain wasn't going to get involved,
why
would we? Hitler took the Sudetenland...and then the rest of
Czechoslavalkia--and the democracies did nothing.
Hitler wanted still more. He wanted Poland. However,
he was
afraid that Joseph Stalin might send Russian troops to stop
him.
So he negotiated a non-aggression pact with the Soviets,
essentially an
agreement between Hitler and Stalin to carve up eastern Europe
among
themselves. And then Hitler moved into Poland--August, 1939.
This time, France, Britain and other democracies (though not yet
the
United States) came to the aid of Poland. But it was too
late. With his blitzkrieg strategy, Hitler's troops
swallowed all
of Poland in three weeks. And he wasn't finished!
Hitler
expanded his empire east and west, promising his people he would
create
an empire that would last for 1,000 years--the Third Reich, the
third
great German empire. By 1940, Hitler had defeated the
French,
forcing French to form a government (the Vichy government) that
would
cooperate with him. Not all the French forces capitulated:
Charles DeGaulle led free French forces that would continue the
fight
elsewhere. But Hitler dominated continental Europe.
He worried, however, that the British might turn the tables on
him, and
he was determined to knock them out of the war as well. He
launched what's called the Battle of Britain, an air assault on
British
targets...including civilian targets. The British lost
40,000
civilians to bombing attacks. But, led by their new prime
minister, Winston Churchill, the British held on. The pilots of
the RAF
took to the skies with their Spitfires and held off the
Luftwaffe. Winston Churchill paid these men a tremendous and
famous tribute: never before in history have so many owed so much
to so
few.
Absolutely true. Britain and the RAF, standing alone, was all that
stood between Hitler and decades on Nazi domination of Europe.
But why was Britain alone? Where was the United States?
America was very slow to react, in large part because Americans
had
come to regard WWI as a great mistake and were convinced that
getting
involved in another European war would be an even greater mistake.
Contributing to this attitude was a senate investigation led by
senator
Albert Nye of North Dakota. Senator Nye's committee
concluded,
plausibly, that direct American involvement in WWI had come about
because American arms manufacturers and other big businesses had
made
tons of money selling weapons and other supplies to WWI
belligerents
like Britain and France. When these nations hadn't the cash
to
pay, the US government had stepped in with massive loans to these
countries [Bryan, by the way, had opposed
these
loans as the equivalent of war.]. But this meant that
America
stood to lose millions and millions of dollars if Britain and
France
lost and couldn't pay off their debts. So, the argument ran, we
ended
up throwing good US lives after bad US bucks.
In any case, we were not going to make that mistake again.
In
1935, 1936, and 1937, Congress passed Neutrality Acts trying to
prevent
a repeat of pre-WWI mistakes. No American was allowed to
sail on
a belligerent ship, the ship of a country at war. No
American
could sell or transport munitions to a belligerent country.
No
American could make loans to a belligerent country.
The right actions: the wrong war. This time, the events in Europe
would
eventually hit the United States no matter what we did. US
inaction only meant further totalitarian aggression and a worse
situation when we eventually did decide to fight. But it was
going to take quite a while before we figured this out.
In 1939, when Hitler attacked Poland, the United States acted
quickly...too affirm its neutrality! One more Neutrality
Act. Now we did agree later that year to sell arms to
Britain--but only on a cash and carry basis. No risky
loans
No risky transport of weapons.
1940 was a presidential election year. The Japanese were
creating
an island empire in the Pacific. With Hitler's help,
Mussolini
was trying to create an Italian empire in North Africa. And
Hitler
was gobbling up everything in sight, eventually beginning that
Battle
of Britain I mentioned. You would think that at least one of
the
major party candidates would suggest direct American involvement
in the
war. But both Roosevelt (running for an unprecedented third
term)
and Wilkie (the Republican candidate) promised peace. "Your
boys
are not going to be sent into any foreign wars," said Roosevelt.
But as Roosevelt began his third term in 1941, he decided
*someone* was
going to have to stop Hitler. And so he pushed through
Congress a
very strange piece of legislation, the Lend-Lease Act.
Lend-Lease
promised unlimited assistance to any nation fighting against
Hitler in
return for the promise that any leftover materials would be
returned to
us at the war's end. Lend-Lease slogans: "Billions, not
bodies." "Send guns, not sons." Eventually, we spent
$50
billion on Lend-Lease assistance.
Now, obviously, once we were spending this kind of money, we had
entered the war against Hitler whether we said we had or
not. But
also peculiar is what happened to much of that Lend-Lease
money.
In June 1941, Hitler broke his non-aggression pact with Stalin,
and
sent troops into the Soviet Union. This meant that Stalin
was now
fighting against Hitler--and therefor was eligible for Lend-Lease
money. And we gave it to him--to the tune of $11
billion!!!
The Communists had said the capitalists were the time of people
who
would sell you a rope you planned to hang them with. Here,
we
were lending them the rope on the promise they'd return it to us
when
they were done. We seemed like we were on the road to disaster: a
nation that won't fight for its freedom won't be free very long.
But, as it turned out, the United States wasn't quite the cripple
Mussolini, Hitler, the Japanese (and Stalin) thought it was.
December 7, 1941. The Japanese launched a surprise attack on
the
American naval base at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii. In military
terms,
not a bad move: America didn't have much of a fleet to begin with,
and
this took out a substantial portion of what we did have.
But the attack on Pearl Harbor proved to be a great psychological
mistake. Overnight, the American mood changed, and the
pacifist,
isolationist, cowardly United States turned itself into the
mightiest
military machine in history. American factories converted to
the
production of war materials, turning out 40 billion bullets,
300,000
aircraft, 76,000 ships, 86,000 tanks, 2.6 million machine
guns.
Henry Kaiser's factories could put together a battleship in 14
days.
American women went to work in the factories so we could create
all
this. American farmers turned out record harvests. We eventually
had
15,000,000 men serving in the armed forces--enough to do the job.
It is pointless for me to try to condense the long and fascination
story of US military exploits in WW II. I will only
summarize by
saying that, after the victory at Midway, American forces got the
upper
hand in the Pacific, little by little pushing the Japanese
back.
We pushed into Italy as well, and, on June 6, 1945, we led the
most
massive military assault in all of history, the Normandy
Invasion. Once American, British, and Free French forces
secured
this position, Hitler faced the German nightmare: the two-front
war,
and, although there was plenty of fighting left, the German war
effort
didn't have much chance. By April of 1945, Hitler lay dead
in a
Berlin bunker.
The war against Japan looked as if it might go on much
longer.
Japanese pilots (the Kamikaze pilots) flew suicide machines,
deliberately crashing their planes into American ships to try to
take
out as many American boys as they could.
What ended the carnage was the development of the mightiest weapon
the
world had ever seen. In August of 1945, the US dropped an
atomic
bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima, and then a 2nd bomb on the
city
of Nagasaki. With that, the Japanese surrendered.
It had been a horrible war with at least 40,000,000
casualties--many
millions of them civilian casualties. But the good guys had
won...sort of.